Welcome to KPW Outdoors
  • Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Gear Reviews
  • Trip Reports
  • Media
  • Contact

GEAR REVIEW: TUBBS FLEX VRT SNOWSHOES

3/3/2018

5 Comments

 
The Tubbs Flex VRT is an aggressive backcountry snowshoe made for mountain use. I tested these snowshoes over the course of 3 months during winter 2017-2018, putting on 62 miles/100km in a variety of snowy environments. As a previous owner of the MSR Lightning Ascents and Atlas Elektra's, I feel I can accurately gauge the performance of the Flex VRTs in comparison to its competitors.

Tubbs Flex VRT- Mens and Womens
Price: $259 USD
Size: 22 (womens), and 24 and 28 (mens)
Weight: 4lbs (22), 4.5lbs (24), and 5lbs (28)

Features: 

The Tubbs Flex VRT features a flexible plastic decking with a flexible tail area, heel lifter bar,  aggressive Viper 2.0 toe crampon and traction rails, and a hinged dynamic fit binding system. 

The binding system uses BOA cinching technology, used in helmets as well as footwear for golf, hockey, snowboarding, hiking and running.
Tubbs Flex VRT Snowshoes
Aggressive crampon
Heel Lifter Bar
​Pros:
Climbing ability- Upon first glance at these snowshoes, you can't help but notice the aggressive crampon under foot as well as the gnarly side traction rails. After months of testing one thing is for sure: these snowshoes are made for climbing. Hard pack, powder, ice- these snowshoes are amazing at ascending and descending the steepest terrain. My favourite place to use them is the Adirondacks! My husband bent the crampon on his MSR Lightning Ascents (they have now changed the material as this was common) but has yet to have any issues with Flex VRT carbon steel crampons.

Binding system- I am in love with this simple to use binding system. The harness opens up so easily that I can step my foot in and be ready to go in no time. For people like me with cold hands, I don't even have to take off my mitts to get my foot in or out of the shoe. My husband and I both appreciated not having to do up 8 individual rubber straps each time we put on and took off our snowshoes like we did with our MSRs. The BOA system is very easy to use but the cables are exposed and I worry about the longevity in the backcountry and worry if one broke while adventuring. You can buy replacement cables if one does break and so far I have not had any issues. The binding system is hinged, allowing for freedom of movement unlike my old Atlas Elektra snowshoes, which recoiled like a flip flop sending snow up my backside. Lastly, I used the binding with mountaineering boots, hiking boots, and winter boots and the binding fit well on each type without an pressure points.

Stride- The Flex VRT snowshoes have one of the most natural stride feelings I have ever had in a snowshoe. Both my husband and I love how you can just walk normally and not have to adjust how you walk. Efficiency when moving in snow is important and I feel like these snowshoes do not feel clunky or awkward.

Decking- The flexible plastic decking especially in the tail area is useful on uneven terrain. In the Adirondacks, roots and rocks are covered but snow makes travel sometimes awkward on snowshoes except for the Flex VRTs. The torsional decking adapts to the terrain and allows for ease of travel. The only issue I had with the decking is on hard pack terrain when the decking creates a lot of noise making it somewhat difficult to have a conversation with your buddy.

Float- In deep powder I found the float sufficient for my weight. The decking was able to displace my body weight  with a pack and lifting my foot wasn't arduous.

Durability- After putting these snowshoes through some tough environments, the Flex VRTs are showing very little signs of wear. I am very optimistic that these snowshoes will pass the test of time and be able to withstand the abuse that backcountry travel inflicts on them. So far they are bomber!

Price- Tubbs Flex VRT wins the price comparison- The Tubbs Flex VRT MSRP: $259 USD, MSR Lightning Ascent $299 USD, and Atlas Aspect $289 USD
MSR Lightning Ascent vs. Tubbs Flex VRT
Testing two models in icy conditions. The Tubbs model gripped better.
Easy step in harness of the Flex VRT.
​Cons:
Weight- As a woman who travels in the backcountry I count every gram I carry. The Tubbs Flex VRT 22 inch long snowshoe pair weighs 4lbs vs the MSR Lightning Ascent 22in snowshoe weighs in at  3lbs 12oz. Believe it or not, you can really feel the extra weight- one of my test days involved wearing one of each. If the snowshoes could drop an ounce or two it would make a big difference on long days.

Packability- I carried these snowshoes on a backpack a few times. Due to the bulky binding system, they don't pack together as well as the MSRs but they are better than my old Atlas pair.

Heel Lifter Bar- Although I loved the heel lifter bar and its height, I found it difficult to raise while wearing thicker mitts. To lift it, you had to slide your finger along the a depression in the decking (see photo above) which worked using thinner handwear but not thicker. I would suggest using a bar with a curve it in or creating an easier way to lift the bar up. 

Best Uses: Steep mountain terrain where grip is essential.

Full disclosure: Tubbs provided me with these snowshoes for the purpose of this review. The opinions expressed are completely my own.
Ascending ladders in the Adirondacks. Note the hinged binding.
The Flex VRTs are confidence inspiring on ice.
Packing the Flex VRTs on a backpack.
5 Comments
Eric Ouellet
20/11/2019 04:23:07 pm

Hi, do you recommend them over MSR evo 22 or not. Which one do you prefer?

Reply
Krista
22/11/2019 09:50:10 am

Hi Eric
My husband has used both the MSR Evo Ascents and the Tubbs Flex VRTs. The MSR pros are: you wear them short for packed trails or with tails (sold separately) for extra float in powder. The MSRs have great traction but older models have metal crampons that bend pretty easily (MSR has rectified this by using a different metal). The MSRs pack better on your pack because the harness system is flat. The pros for the Tubbs are: Tubbs have an easier to use Boa harness system and have a bomber aggressive crampon system along with a natural snowshoe stride. The plastic flexes very well when snowshoeing in concave surfaces. Both models wear well with the plastic platform but both are noisy when walking on packed trails.

My 6'2" 190lb hubby prefers the Tubbs Flex VRTs. Hope that helps!

Reply
Ryan D link
23/12/2020 06:48:08 pm

Lovely blog you hhave here

Reply
Mike Vanderbeck
26/11/2021 02:58:19 pm

im 6 189 what size does your husband use? Im thinking the 24" option should work

Reply
Krista
26/11/2021 07:00:37 pm

Hey Mike! My hubby has the 28” length. He opted for the longer length for more float in powder. He also considered the weight of the pack he would normally carry in addition to his own weight. If you are sticking to hard packed trails the 24s should be fine but otherwise get the 28s! Hope this helps. Cheers, Krista

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Canadian gal hooked on pursuing outdoor adventures, testing outdoor gear, and a passion for outdoor education.

    Archives

    March 2022
    December 2021
    October 2020
    August 2020
    October 2019
    August 2019
    February 2019
    August 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    October 2017
    August 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    November 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    October 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015

    Categories

    All
    Backpacking
    Camping
    Climbing
    Clothing
    Hiking
    Snowsports
    Tents
    Watersports

    RSS Feed

Instructor/Ambassador for:
Picture
Picture
Picture
​<script type="text/javascript" src="http://classic.avantlink.com/affiliate_app_confirm.php?mode=js&authResponse=d43d81bd3781e1d2abd21e2d070927932a5cd5c0"></script>

​