Alpine Fit has created a unique merino wool beanie style hat that can be used for multiple purposes. I tried this hat out during the winter of 2023 while nordic skiing, backcountry skiing, downhill skiing (under a helmet), hiking, snowshoeing and casual use. Here are my thoughts:

Alpine Fit Nordic Anywhere Merino Wool Hat
Size: One Size
Colours: Kelp Green, Charcoal Grey, Outer Coast Blue
Price: $40 USD
Weight: 1.4 Oz

Features:

The Alpine Fit Nordic Anywhere Merino Wool hat is made from 100% ethically sourced merino wool that is both soft and odor-resistant. The hat circumference is 21 inches plus stretch and is made in Anchorage, Alaska. It features two different ingenious ways of wearing it: slouch style or brim style.

Pros:

My first impression of this merino wool hat right out of the package was how soft it is. This fabric feels pleasant to wear and is not itchy whatsoever. The hat has a double layer of the merino wool but feels lightweight and very comfortable. The hat performed well in athletic contexts - it is breathable but warm. 

I am absolutely in love with the slouchy look option of this athletic hat. So many winter athletic hats are carbon copies of the same design and I love how this one is so different. I normally wear it in slouch mode but when wearing it under certain helmets, I fold it into brim style. I love how I can wear it for both athletic wear but also for casual use. It has a great outdoor community vibe to it! 

I tried the beanie/toque under a climbing helmet and downhill ski helmet (and it would also work under a bike helmet). For my climbing helmet I did have to fold it up to brim style to get extra layers over my ears but for downhill skiing I could just pull it right over in slouch style. I liked how this worked as I could transition the hat seamlessly into 'apres-ski' style immediately.

The beanie/toque covers the ears very well in either mode. I have found some winter athletic hats that creep up but this one doesn't. It is also very small and compact, making it an easy choice for bringing along anywhere.

Over this winter this hat has become my 'go-to' hat for winter athletic wear and for casual use. I always find myself grabbing it! I am going to buy this hat in other colours! Check out the link above for more glowingly positive reviews and photos. 

Cons:

In colder wind, I could feel my ears get a bit chilly in slouch mode. The solution is simple: fold over the fabric into brim style. It eliminates the chill immediately! 

Best Uses: Casual use, winter sports, under a bike or climbing helmet.

Full Disclosure: Alpine Fit provided me this hat for the purpose of this review. It has become my absolute favourite hat so I would have bought it anyway!

Alpine Fit has created a stylish slim merino wool lined headband to keep your ears toasty in cooler conditions. It is made with a lightweight, breathable, quick-drying fabric that I tested over the winter of 2023 while nordic skiing, snowshoeing, winter hiking, and backcountry alpine skiing. How did it perform? Keep reading!

Alpine Fit Merino Wool Lined Headband
Colours: Sea to Sky, Tree Light, Summit Horizon, Stone Marble, Chugach Dusk, Purple Mountain
Size: One Size
Price: $30 USD
Weight: 1.5oz

Features:

Alpine Fit has combined an inner fabric made of 100% merino wool and a wicking polyester fabric as it's outer. The merino wool is ethically sourced and the wicking polyester printed fabric is made from 86% recycled fabric. The polyester fabric also has 14% stretch to accommodate different head sizes. The headband has a 19 inch circumference and and is made in Alaska.

Pros:

I was super excited to receive this headband and had a difficult time deciding on which print to get. The colour choices are all amazing and so stylish! I finally decided on the Summit Horizon pattern because I wear a lot of blue and did not regret it for one minute. I am thinking the Sea to Sky might be next! 

The headband covers my larger-than-average forehead and fits comfortably around my head circumference. I don't ever feel any tension and I am sensitive to headwear that is 'too tight'. The dual fabric is soft, smooth, and stretchy. The website does not show the width of this headband so I measured it:  3.5 inches wide.

In winter conditions, my ears were never cold. My head was able to vent heat and I felt comfortable and warm around my ears. The headband was able to cut the wind and was able to wick any moisture from my sweat glands.

The headband is indeed lightweight and packs up small. I love how it can be stashed in anywhere: Easily fits in a pocket, hip belt pocket, or pack. 

Although I never tried this, the headband looks like it can be easily reversed and worn with the merino wool side out. I always preferred to have the print side out but it could be done!

Comparing this headband to other brands I have tried like Buff, Icebreaker and Patagonia, I can hands down say that this one is my absolute favourite! It hits the mark when it comes to keeping the ears cozy but being able to regulate heat as well as adding a stylish pattern to it's look. I love it for all my winter aerobic pursuits. I would get one ASAP! 

Cons:

To be honest, I normally can find something I don't like about a product, but in this case I can't identify one! This one is a keeper! I need more!

Best uses: Nordic skiing, winter hiking, running, or under a climbing/biking helmet!

Full disclosure: Alpine Fit sent me this headband for the purpose of this review. I definitely would have bought this headband regardless I love it that much!

Tired of your phone battery losing power when outside in cold temperatures? So was I. Not only does my battery power drop over the course of a day outside but also my phone's battery health after a winter normally drops 5%. I scoured the internet to find a solution. After not finding many options with positive reviews, I tried a couple of options including non-insulated cases combined with handwarmers, and finally the Treqa Artic and Polar insulated phone cases. The non-insulated-handwarmer combo was no comparision to the Treqa options. I tested these two cases out over the course of the winter of 2022 while downhill and cross country skiing, winter camping, and teaching outdoor education.

Never heard of Treqa? They are experts in synthetic insulation and have created these phone cases for the purpose of multi-day winter travel. They recommend wearing the phone case in an inner pocket but I tested the cases out in the inner, outer and also hanging off my pack chest strap.

Treqa Arctic Insulated Phone Case
Size: 3.5" x 7.25" (Fits all iPhones and most Android/Samsung Phones)
Colour: Navy, Indigo, Yellow, Sky Blue, Orange, Slate Blue
Price: $24.99 CAD

Treqa Polar Insulated Phone Case
Size: 4” x 7.25”
Colours: Orange, Red, Yellow, Mint, Sky Blue
Price: $39.00 CAD

Features:

Similarities: Both the Arctic and Polar cases are designed to work best while used in a inside pocket. They they both use synthetic insulation, have durable outer fabrics and zippers that don't snag or slide improperly.

Differences: The Artic has 150gsm of synthetic insulation whereas the Polar bumps it up to 200gsm. The Polar case is slightly larger in size and has a corner zip whereas the smaller Arctic case has a top zip. The Polar case has a more robust outer fabric that is water resistant therefore being at a higher price point.

Both cases are windproof, are filled with hypoallergenic insulation and have a black webbing belt loop that sits vertically on the back of the case.

Pros:

They work! After a winter of testing, my battery health percentage has not dropped from 100%! In addition my battery power level never once dropped rapidly like it does without a case. I didn't always wear the phone case on the inside pocket either. I wore it on the inside pocket, outside chest pocket during cross country skiing and sometimes even hanging off a backpack chest strap on milder days.

After a winter of testing both insulated cases, I found that they are both very durable. The photo above is after a winter of testing and they both still look new!

The Polar case is slightly larger and therefore I reached for it a bit more than the Arctic case. It also has the advantage of a higher amount of insulation and a water repellant fabric which I seem to gravitate to more then using it in the jacket outside chest pockets and hanging off my backpack. For the Arctic case, I tended to use it more when stuffing it inside an inner pocket when downhill skiing. Both cases fit my iPhone 12 Pro and Lifeproof Case inside with ease. Note: I normally only wore the case externally in temperatures above the freezing mark and inside below freezing. If wearing the case externally in below freezing temperatures, I would recommend adding a hand warmer as the phone does get cold to the touch.

Both cases are lightweight and slim. They are not bulky and come in a variety of colours. I think they are both priced at an affordable price point.

I liked both cases and would recommend either. This is the first case I have found that my battery was preserved well and would highly recommend this case for anyone wanting to recreate outdoors in the winter while maintaining battery power and battery health of their phone.

Cons:

When my phone was stuff inside the case inside an inner pocket let's say while downhill skiing it worked perfectly. When cross country skiing I stuff the phone and case into a outer chest pocket as my cross country ski attire is much thinner and pocket options are more limited. When building up heat and sweat aerobically, the moisture travelled from my skin through my baselayer and jacket and then the case to produce some moisture on the outside of my phone. This would be something I might want to address or change in future versions of this case. An outer fabric that is a bit more moisture repellent would be ideal.

The corner zip on the Polar case is a neat feature but I didn't find that it worked well with my iPhone 12 Pro and Lifeproof case. When stuffed in a chest pocket (inner or outer) it was difficult to access the phone as it kept getting caught on the corner. I would need two hands to remove it instead of one. Apparently this design issue will be fixed in the next roll out of cases.

There has been a movement towards winter insulated products that are battery powered. I would love to see a case with heating elements inside with a small battery to power it. This would be great for those extra cold days!

Best Uses: Outdoor cold weather recreation for anyone wanting to maintain cell phone battery power.

Full Disclosure: Treqa provided me with these cases for the purpose of this review.

Looking for a warm synthetic layering jacket? Look no further than the Women's Treqa Sonam and Dablam jackets. Never heard for of Treqa? Neither had I, but I am paying attention to this small Canadian company working it's way into the outdoor market. Interesting fact: They get all their products manufactured in Nepal, a place near and dear to my heart. 

The Sonam and Dablam jackets are meant for warm in cold environments where you are doing more sedentary activity. Both have equal levels of insulation, but the Dablam is meant for layering under a shell whereas the Sonam can be used on it's own and is more windproof. I tested out both these jackets throughout the cold winter of 2022 while downhill skiing, winter camping, ice fishing and teaching outdoor ed.

Treqa Sonam Jacket
Sizes: XS to XXL
Colours: Green, Black, Blue
Price: $182 CAD
Weight: 21.2oz

Treqa Dablam Jacket
Sizes: XS to XXL
Colours: Black, Red, Blue
Price: $184 CAD
​Weight: 16.6oz

Features of the Treqa Sonam Jacket:

Features of the Treqa Dablam Jacket:

Pros:

Both jackets were very warm! Both the Sonam and the Dablam have a whopping 150 grams per square meter of insulation. What does that mean? Both jackets are best for temperature ranges of 0C to +10C. That said, I wore those jackets as midlayer under a shell most of the winter down to -25C. The insulation is woven so that it doesn't shift therefore reducing heat loss which you can feel when you wear it! 

After using them as midlayers for an entire winter, I can say that they performed equally or better than my down midlayers. They performed better for warmth than my existing synthetic fleece jackets and synthetic Arc'teryx Atom LT.  I was pleasantly surprised that both jackets kept me warm and cozy during a colder-than-normal winter. The Sonam is more windproof than the Dablam, and I used it often without a shell overtop on milder days. I am looking forward to wearing them as stand alone pieces in the spring and fall.

Treqa boasts that you get more insulation per square meter compared to mainstream name brand synthetic insulated jackets on their website but you pay more for it. At $182-$184 per jacket they are well underpriced compared to other manufacturers. A Treqa jacket offers you better insulation for less money! Check out their comparison chart versus big name brands on this page. 

As a woman who fluctuates between small and medium sizing (small in OR an Patagonia, medium in Arc'teryx), I found that the small Treqa jackets fit best. I could fit a baselayer or other thin layers underneath and the small jackets fit well under my shells.

I found the features of this jacket to be well thought out. Two hand pockets and one inner pocket big enough to fit a phone in an insulated case and maybe more! The high collared neck and easy to use zipper work well, and I had no issues with the fabric wearing during any of my testing.

Style wise, I preferred the look of the Sonam jacket. I just like the quilted pattern better and all round fit. 

Cons:
The con of the superior insulation quality is weight penalty​. Check out the comparison test below. The small Sonam jacket weighed in at 441g (15.6oz) whereas the small Dablam only weighed 309g (10.9). Compared to my small Patagonia Down Sweater Hoody at 298g (10.5oz), the Treqa Sonam Jacket definitely weighs significantly more, but it was constructed with a second layer of windproof fabric inside making it an insulated jacket and windblocker in one, hence the heavier weight. While downhill skiing, winter car camping, and teaching Outdoor Ed I am more sedentary and value warmth over weight in those situations. Plus if synthetic material gets wet, I don't worry about losing warmth like I do with down.

As a woman who winter recreates, I almost always buy my jackets (even mid layers) with hoods. I would like to see Treqa add hooded versions to their line up in the future, especially the Sonam. The Dablam may be close to the Patagonia Down Sweater Hoody in weight, but that includes a hood.
​​
Comparison Test:

​The Sonam and Dablam jackets come with their own stuff sack but I don't have one so I used a generic one. I looked a compressibility compared to down and weight. Predictably the synthetic jackets weighed slightly more and the Sonam jacket was not very compressible. Surprisingly the Dablam compressed to a similar size to the down jacket. 

New for Fall 2018, the Outdoor Research Black Powder II Pants have been updated to be more streamlined and slimmed down. 

Outdoor Research Women's Black Powder II Pants
​Size: XS-L
Colour: Black, Saddle
​Price: $249 USD
Weight: 25.6oz/724g (medium)
Fit: Standard

Features:

The Black Powder II Pants feature a waterproof, windproof breathable Pertex Shield 200D 100% Nylon 

​Hand pockets (one with an avy beacon clip), thigh pocket and back pocket. Integrated belt system.

​Pros:
Durability - When the Blackpowder II Pants arrived, you can immediately feel the quality of the material used to make these pants. The 200D Pertex shield fabric instantly boosts your confidence that these pants will be able to withstand attacks from sharp edges and moisture. They feel very durable and no wonder they are popular with lifties and patrollers. 

Snowboard vs Ski - As a skier and a snowboarder, I actually preferred using these pants snowboarding. The durable Pertex Shield 200 D fabric was great when sitting down on the snow strapping into my board. The fabric shed snow and moisture really well and I felt they worked with my snowboard style better.  The internal gaiter fit well over both my snowboard and ski boots in the size medium unlike other reviewers have mentioned.

High Waist - OR has raised the fabric to cover part of the low back. I love this feature on some of their other pants like the Iceline Pant but really liked when snowboarding. Bending over is part of the deal snowboarding and I love how these pants had by back covered! 

Pockets - These pants have 4 usable pockets which come in handy as a ski/snowboard race coach. I could fit tools, extra lift tickets, money, and start lists in these hand pockets. 

​Insulation- I wouldn't call these pants well insulated but the burly outer fabric combined with the inner linings have kept me warm on the coldest of days. The polyester tricot lining feels great in areas where I feel cold the most:  the bum and hips.

Protection from the elements- I wore these pants in rainstorms and snowstorms this winter. Rain beaded off the Pertex fabric and left me feeling pretty confident that these pants can handle anything Mother Nature will throw at it. 

Cons:
Tight around hips - I found the pants a bit tight around the hips and I would consider myself an average built woman. For a women's specific design I would use or add more of a stretch material that contours around a woman's hips and allows for more freedom of movement  flexion and extension of knees and hips.

Heavy for touring - Although the Blackpowder II pants have touring features like a beacon pocket and clip, generous side venting options as well as breathable fabric, I would not use these pants for long uphill tours. Heli-skiing, catskiing and short sidecountry forays would be more appropriate. Not really a con per se, but wanted to clarify where I think they would best be used.

Belt - I love having belt systems on my outdoor pants. The internal belt system works well on these pants I would most definitely prefer velcro adjustments to this hook in style belt. I have used velcro before on OR's Iceline and Cirque pants and really like how quickly you can adjust it (in case you eat a big lunch!) as well as how well it snugs your sides. The webbing belt system is effective but didn't feel great all the time. A small piece of webbing definitely is less comfortable than velcro.

Best Uses: Resort Skiing and Snowboarding, Patrolling, Instructors, Lifties, Racing, Sidecountry

Disclaimer: I was given these ski pants as part of OR's #ORInsightLab. The opinions expressed in my review are completely my own.

The Outdoor Research Women's Transcendent Down Hoody was completely re-designed for Fall 2018 with a number of big changes. 

Outdoor Research Women's Transcendent Down Hoody
Sizes: XS to XL
Colours: Black, Lapis (blue), Slate, Garnet/Zin, Pacific Plum/Amethyst, Seaglass/Washed Peacock
Price: $225 USD
Weight: 12.9oz/ 366g

Features:

The Transcendent features water-resistant, wind-resistant 20D lightweight 100% ripstop polyester. It is filled with 650 responsibly sourced goose down insulation.

Pros:

Women's fit- New for Fall 2018, OR is introducing an all new women's fit. This new design fit is supposed to increase movement, layering, and leave room for expansion due muscle hypertrophy. As I see it, the Transcendent Hoody meets all of the criteria.  The hoody allows for ease of movement. I don't feel restricted at all in any plane of movement. Secondly, I can layer the hoody (size small) over multiple other layers including baselayers, insulating layers and shells. The puffy's thin profile also allows it to layer underneath shells seamlessly allowing it to be used for a variety of activities. Lastly, I can spot subtle details like the ruching around chest and upper back areas allowing for expansion in case you carry more size in those areas.
​
Compressibility- The Transcendent Hoody is 650 fill down jacket. Traditionally this means that the jacket is not as compressible as a 800 fill jacket nor as lightweight. I did a quick test to compare against two other jackets and found a striking outcome. The Transcendent jacket compresses smaller than the Patagonia Down Sweater Hoody (800 fill- size small) but larger than the Mountain Hardwear Ghost Whisperer Jacket (800 fill-size medium). I was surprised that this jacket beat out a market favourite 800 fill jacket for compressibility. Impressive! Check out the photos below a scroll over the for captions.

​Lightweight- According to the OR website, the medium sized Transcendent Hoody rings in at 12.9oz/366g. Comparing it to the Patagonia Down Sweater Hoody at 13.1oz/371g for a medium. This again is a surprising outcome - a 650 fill jacket lighter than an 800 fill?  

Style- OR has expanded it's colour selection for women in recent years and so the jacket comes in a variety of colours. They have even created a few two-tone jackets such as mine in the Pacific Plum/Amethyst. I am enjoying these new style options for women - I am not a fan of the old way of taking a men's garment and  'shrink it and pink it' for women's outdoor clothing. I also like the new fit of the women's clothing...not too tight and not too loose. 

Warmth-  I have used the Transcendent Hoody the entire winter which had temperatures from above freezing to -30 below. I generally used the jacket as a mid-layer for resort skiing under a shell which worked fabulously. I also used it to throw on and off before and after cross country skiing and snowshoeing in the car. I can't say that I was ever cold in the jacket - it performs well for warm and is not lacking warmth by any means but I didn't use it as an outer layer when standing around in the winter. I am looking forward to using it this spring as a hiking lunchtime layer and as a stand along when spring camping. It hasn't replaced my belay parka and winter camping expedition down jackets but does the job for an in between layer.

Weather Resistance - The 20D ripstop nylon feels lightweight and slippery. It has been able to handle some light moisture (moist snow and light rain). It protects me from the wind well and the hood is great at bumping up warmth and protection if the weather is not agreeable.

Cons:
Baffle fill-When I saw the Transcendent online, the wide baffles and photo made me think that jacket would be a mid-poof-sized down jacket landing somewhere between my expedition size down jacket and my lightweight thin down jacket. When it  first arrived  I was disappointed to see the baffles weren't completely stuffed resembling more of a lightweight thin down jacket. I'm not sure what the ratio of down to feathers is in the baffles but they seem to be evenly filled and puff out somewhat but not to the degree I was imagining. I would recommend that it be distinguished a bit more from the Outdoor Research Illuminate 800 fill (which is competitive with the top 800 fill lightweight jackets on the market) and an expedition puffy, even if it decreases compressibility and increases weight. I would fill the baffles and fatten the jacket out a bit more. Sure it might mean that it doesn't work as a mid-layer anymore, but that's what the jackets like the Illuminate are for. I would love a puffy that works as an outer layer for non-expedition temperatures.

Durability - The 20D nylon fabric has stood up to all the use and abuse I have put it through this winter. While wearing it I threw my alpine skis over my shoulder, leaned the metal edges of my xc skis against it and even got it caught a couple times in doors and backpacks. So far it has stood up to the test of time unlike my 10D Ghost Whisperer puffy that has multiple holes in it. I do hope it continues to shine but if this is what has given the puffy it's lightweightness, I have to question it's long term durability.

Best Uses: Mid-layer for resort skiing, an overlayer for aerobic winter activities, hut puffy, casual.

Disclaimer: I was given this puffy as part of the #ORInsightLab. The opinions expressed in this review are completely my own.

As an avid cold weather female adventurer, I struggle with keeping my hands from freezing. If you're like me you carry multiple pairs of gloves and mitts with you on outings, use chemical hot packs and have spent the big bucks on battery operated gloves. The struggle to keep my hands warm and dry is real, and if mismanaged leads me to have frozen fumbly fingers that can't manage to do up a zipper. The thawing out process can bring tears to my eyes and can take 15 minutes of straight walking just to re-gain circulation. Another option was presented to me recently that I was desperate to try: UThermic Coldscreen. UThermic is a heat-producing moisturizing body lotion that I tested out over the winter of 2018 while hiking, cross country skiing, ice climbing, and downhill skiing.

UThermic
Price: $24.99 for 5.1oz

My results:
​Reading the instructions for use of the UThermic Coldscreen product is key to its use. Here are my best tips in order to maximize its effect:

Tip #1: Apply before going outside

I found the product worked best by applying about 15 minutes before use. If you are travelling by car or handling gear, wear handwear so that the coldscreen doesn't come off. The best way I can describe the warm sensation is that it is similar to a tingling hot cinnamon candy in your mouth!

Tip #2: Wear your insulated, windproof handwear

A rookie mistake I made is anticipating your hands will get hot and wearing thinner gloves or mitts. I suggest wearing your insulated windproof handwear until the product heats up. If the warmth becomes too hot, then switch out to your thinner handwear.

Tip #3: Don't touch sensitive areas with bare hands

Habits are hard to break . I wiped my nose one day and transferred some of the lotion on to my face by accident. Big mistake!  A male friend of mine had to urinate and transferred some Coldscreen on a sensitive area! I found you had to be consciously mindful of where you are touching!

Tip #4: Move!

I found more rigorous the movement the better the product worked. Higher aerobic intensity winter activities like cross country skiing produced the greatest warming effect while downhill skiing and ice climbing were less. That said, even in activities that are more sedentary, I still found the lotion prevented my hands from getting to the freezing level they normally do. 

Tip #5: Pack your tube in a Ziploc

I mistakenly packed my Coldscreen tube in my luggage on one winter hiking trip. Some residue must have still been on the outside of the tube and was absorbed by the clothing I packed. I had one hike that I suffered annoyingly very hot inner elbow and collarbone as a result of lotion getting on my baselayer! I now pack it in a plastic bag.

Tip #6: Wash your hands in cold water

After exercising it's normal to hop in the shower which I did the first time I used UThermic Coldscreen. It didn't take long before I regretted the feeling of hot water on my hands, which amplified the heating effect. Make sure to wash the lotion off in cold water thoroughly before entering a shower or hot tub!

Pros: 
UThermic Coldscreen works. My hands never got to the point this winter full on freeze and painful thaw. I ditched my battery operated gloves and chemical hand warmers and fully committed to using the product. I continued to pack multiple sets of handwear like normal and swapped out gloves and mitts depending on my output and how hot my hands were.

I like the idea of not producing so much waste as there is with chemical hot packs and spending less money than battery operated gloves. The 5.1oz/150ml bottle lasted me a whole winter and I have some left over for next year!

UThermic Coldscreen is made from 98% natural ingredients. This is important to me as I don't like putting unnecessary chemicals on my body. The bottle is recyclable and so is the box it came in. The lotion is fragrance free and its not tested on animals. It is safe for all skin types. The product's effects lasts 4-6 hours. I never had to re-apply even on longer days in colder temperatures.

When sweating the lotion doesn't come off or lose intensity. I felt like it worked as hard as I do out there! In fact, I felt the product reduced the normal amount of sweat moisture that gets absorbed in my handwear. Thank you UThermic for making such a great product!

Cons:
I spent most of the winter trying to find consistency while using this product. Some of it was user error (not reading the instructions carefully) but also I found that the product varied depending on how much I put on and what I was doing. Hopefully next year I will follow my tips above and find the consistent pattern. I will update this review with any further tips!

While using the product, I found myself in a couple awkward situations in the ski lodge when meeting someone for the first time. I had to explain why I couldn't shake their hand as per social custom.

Lastly, I had some concerns when it came to eating outdoors with the lotion on. I wasn't sure if I should eat my lunch with my bare hands (ingestion concerns?) so I had to wear thin liner gloves to eat. That proved difficult in some situations (ie opening packaging, etc).

Best uses: Active winter wear. If you are prone to cold hands and feet and/or have Raynaud's Syndrome.

Full disclosure: I was given this product for the purpose of this review. The opinions expressed are completely my own.

The Tubbs Flex VRT is an aggressive backcountry snowshoe made for mountain use. I tested these snowshoes over the course of 3 months during winter 2017-2018, putting on 62 miles/100km in a variety of snowy environments. As a previous owner of the MSR Lightning Ascents and Atlas Elektra's, I feel I can accurately gauge the performance of the Flex VRTs in comparison to its competitors.

Tubbs Flex VRT- Mens and Womens
Price: $259 USD
Size: 22 (womens), and 24 and 28 (mens)
Weight: 4lbs (22), 4.5lbs (24), and 5lbs (28)

Features: 

The Tubbs Flex VRT features a flexible plastic decking with a flexible tail area, heel lifter bar,  aggressive Viper 2.0 toe crampon and traction rails, and a hinged dynamic fit binding system. 

The binding system uses BOA cinching technology, used in helmets as well as footwear for golf, hockey, snowboarding, hiking and running.

​Pros:
Climbing ability- Upon first glance at these snowshoes, you can't help but notice the aggressive crampon under foot as well as the gnarly side traction rails. After months of testing one thing is for sure: these snowshoes are made for climbing. Hard pack, powder, ice- these snowshoes are amazing at ascending and descending the steepest terrain. My favourite place to use them is the Adirondacks! My husband bent the crampon on his MSR Lightning Ascents (they have now changed the material as this was common) but has yet to have any issues with Flex VRT carbon steel crampons.

Binding system- I am in love with this simple to use binding system. The harness opens up so easily that I can step my foot in and be ready to go in no time. For people like me with cold hands, I don't even have to take off my mitts to get my foot in or out of the shoe. My husband and I both appreciated not having to do up 8 individual rubber straps each time we put on and took off our snowshoes like we did with our MSRs. The BOA system is very easy to use but the cables are exposed and I worry about the longevity in the backcountry and worry if one broke while adventuring. You can buy replacement cables if one does break and so far I have not had any issues. The binding system is hinged, allowing for freedom of movement unlike my old Atlas Elektra snowshoes, which recoiled like a flip flop sending snow up my backside. Lastly, I used the binding with mountaineering boots, hiking boots, and winter boots and the binding fit well on each type without an pressure points.

Stride- The Flex VRT snowshoes have one of the most natural stride feelings I have ever had in a snowshoe. Both my husband and I love how you can just walk normally and not have to adjust how you walk. Efficiency when moving in snow is important and I feel like these snowshoes do not feel clunky or awkward.

Decking- The flexible plastic decking especially in the tail area is useful on uneven terrain. In the Adirondacks, roots and rocks are covered but snow makes travel sometimes awkward on snowshoes except for the Flex VRTs. The torsional decking adapts to the terrain and allows for ease of travel. The only issue I had with the decking is on hard pack terrain when the decking creates a lot of noise making it somewhat difficult to have a conversation with your buddy.

Float- In deep powder I found the float sufficient for my weight. The decking was able to displace my body weight  with a pack and lifting my foot wasn't arduous.

Durability- After putting these snowshoes through some tough environments, the Flex VRTs are showing very little signs of wear. I am very optimistic that these snowshoes will pass the test of time and be able to withstand the abuse that backcountry travel inflicts on them. So far they are bomber!

Price- Tubbs Flex VRT wins the price comparison- The Tubbs Flex VRT MSRP: $259 USD, MSR Lightning Ascent $299 USD, and Atlas Aspect $289 USD

​Cons:
Weight- As a woman who travels in the backcountry I count every gram I carry. The Tubbs Flex VRT 22 inch long snowshoe pair weighs 4lbs vs the MSR Lightning Ascent 22in snowshoe weighs in at  3lbs 12oz. Believe it or not, you can really feel the extra weight- one of my test days involved wearing one of each. If the snowshoes could drop an ounce or two it would make a big difference on long days.

Packability- I carried these snowshoes on a backpack a few times. Due to the bulky binding system, they don't pack together as well as the MSRs but they are better than my old Atlas pair.

Heel Lifter Bar- Although I loved the heel lifter bar and its height, I found it difficult to raise while wearing thicker mitts. To lift it, you had to slide your finger along the a depression in the decking (see photo above) which worked using thinner handwear but not thicker. I would suggest using a bar with a curve it in or creating an easier way to lift the bar up. 

Best Uses: Steep mountain terrain where grip is essential.

Full disclosure: Tubbs provided me with these snowshoes for the purpose of this review. The opinions expressed are completely my own.

The 2017-2018 Outdoor Research Floodlight Jacket is marketed as a waterproof and windproof down jacket made for a variety of outdoor uses. I tested this jacket out during the 2017-2018 winter both personally (casual and belay use) as well as professionally as an outdoor education teacher.

Outdoor Research Women's Floodlight Jacket
Price: $395 USD
Size: XS-XL
Colours: Black/Charcoal, Night/Ultraviolet, Pinot/Raspberry
Weight: 20.2oz or 572g for Size Medium

Features:
The Floodlight jacket features Pertex Shield+ 2L 30D ripstop nylon which provides a waterproof, windproof breathable shell protection. The durable water repellant (DWR) finish enables both snow and rain to shed easily from its threads.

The jacket is packed with 650 fill goose down with a wire-brimmed helmet compatible halo hood. It has 3 external pockets and 2 internal pockets, velcro cuff closures, 2 way zipper openings, and stretchy underarm panels.

​Pros:
After wearing the Floodlight jacket over the past few months the number one thing I love about it is that I can wear it in almost all conditions. Our winters in the northeast have become extremely volatile including weekly changes in precipitation: snow, rain, and freezing rain. I love how I can wear this jacket in any weather and not have to worry about the forecast. 

As an outdoor education teacher, I spend a lot of time outdoors facilitating outdoor activity and do more standing than I do moving. This jacket was the perfect solution: warm, waterproof, windproof, and durable. I would totally recommend this jacket to anyone who is an outdoor professional who needs a bombproof warmer layer for sedentary phases of instruction.

The cut and style of the jacket is another reason to love this jacket. I really enjoyed it's longer bum-covering length especially when belaying, teaching, and wearing skinny jeans or leggings! I found myself grabbing this jacket over my shorter length ones in colder weather. It's very flattering and I get many compliments.

When belaying I really liked the two way zipper feature and halo hood. The zipper opens from the bottom of the jacket (while the top is still closed) allowing you to belay using a harness while keeping your bum warm at the same time! I also enjoyed the halo hood feature - it grabs your helmet and allow you to turn your head more naturally with a hood on.

As for sizing, the medium fit me perfectly. I am normally between sizes in OR gear (small and medium) but for this jacket I recommend to select the bigger size if you are in doubt.

​Cons:

My biggest con with this jacket is its weight. At 20.2oz (572g), it is almost double the weight of my other down jackets. I couldn't bear to pack this jacket for my longer distance adventures as it simply weighs too much. 

My second con with this jacket is that I could not wear it in very cold temperatures as it was too thin and not warm enough. The 650-fill goose down kept me warm until about -15C/5F but any colder I would have select a different jacket. I would suggest upping the level of insulation so it could be used in colder environments for sedentary use.

Best Uses: Casual, Guiding, Short-distance adventuring.

Full disclosure: The Floodlight jacket was given to me from OR for the purpose of the review. The opinions expressed in this review are completely my own.

The Outdoor Research Ascendant Hoody is a brand new do-it-all layer that boasts the ability to adapt to both your active insulation and sedentary needs. Can it really replace a breathable fleece layer and lightweight poofy jacket and combine it all into one jacket? To find out, I tested this hoody out over a five month period including a 7 day coastal backpacking trip, a 5 day canoe trip, and several day trips rock climbing and hiking in the summer and fall 2017.

Outdoor Research Ascendant Hoody
Sizes: XS-XL
Colours:Night/Ultraviolet, Black/Flame, Pewter/Typhoon, Pinot/Raspberry, Sea/Atlantis
Weight: 10.9oz (medium) 
Price: $215 USD

Features:
The exterior of this jacket is made from Pertex Microlight 20D ripstop nylon that is both water shedding, windblocking, and stretchy. Although not as waterproof as your shell, rain does bead on its surface quite well. The stretchy material moves with you - not against you.

The interior is a soft fuzzy Polartec Alpha Direct insulating polyester fleece. How does this fabric work? The best analogy I can think of is that the fabric is like a network of thousands of tiny windows that open when you are working hard and close when you are sedentary. The net result is the ability to stay warm (but not sweaty) and cozy all the time. 

Other features include: adjustable helmet compatible hood, internal thumb loops, zippered chest pocket, two handwarmer pockets, and an elastic drawcord hem.

​Pros:
My first impression of this jacket when I picked it up is how light it is. Compared to Outdoor Research's other active insulation jacket the Uberlayer at 16.8 oz, the Ascendant feels significantly lighter at 10.9oz. As someone who counts grams this is a significant difference. The jacket rivals my lightest poofy for weight.

I wore the Ascendant as my only insulation layer on a coastal backpacking trip this summer. The weather was a mix of sun, rain, wind, and damp conditions. At one point it rained hard for 36 hours straight and everything we brought was absolutely soaked. I was grateful to be tent-bound in a synthetic garment at that point - my down poofy would have absorbed the moisture for sure. The jacket felt awesome - water repellent on the outside while keeping you at the perfect cozy temperature inside especially in the damp bone-chilling weather. 

The jacket is packable. No, it doesn't have a special pocket that it crams in to, but it does compress pretty well. I would equate the sizing to a thin fleece. After 5 months of use and abuse, it still looks and wears new. By accident one evening at home I spilt some bacon grease on it and it washed up without leaving a stain. I have washed the jacket a few times since I got it and it still looks brand new!

I find that with all the Polartec Alpha jackets I have owned it's best to wear only one baselayer underneath in order for the fabric to optimally dump or trap heat during aerobic pursuits. What I am finding now is that I can layer the Polartec Alpha jackets (ie. The Outdoor Research Deviator and the Ascendant to create a double layer of efficient thermoregulation in colder conditions. This is revolutionizing how I dress! I can't wait to wear it this winter under a shell and test the entire system. Will update this review thereafter.

Outdoor Research Ascendant Hoody vs. Arc'teryx Atom LT?  I will admit I have been a fan of the popular Atom LT myself for many years and even put it on my 2016 top ten list. After testing the Ascendant, I can confidently say that I like it 10x better. Why? It's lighter (10.9 vs 11.6 oz for women's medium) and the Polartec Alpha Direct fabric allows me to use it over a larger array of temperatures. I find the Atom LT to be too cold at certain temps and too hot in others. The Ascendant is keeps me warmer in colder weather, and cool in hotter weather. Hands down the Ascendant is a more versatile, practical jacket that keeps me feeling cozy all the time.
Another note: I broke my hand and wore a half cast/splint for 6 weeks of my testing. I couldn't even wear my LT hoody as the wrist gaskets were too tight to fit over my splint. The Ascendant's wrist elastics allow for a larger sized wrist or layers (especially if you are a baselayer thumbhole user like me!).

Bottom Line: Does it combine a fleece and light poofy in one? Yes! In above freezing temps it can act as a stand alone piece, and for below freezing it might be part of a layering system, depending on the degree of output. These active insulation garments are really incredible - highly recommended.

Cons:

My only con with this entire jacket are the hand pockets. They are cozy as is, but lack  zippered closures. As a female, I don't always want to stow bigger but important items like my phone and keys in the chest pocket so zippered hand pockets normally do the trick. For me, this would make this jacket 100% perfect and I may never buy another midlayer again.

Best Uses: Hiking, ski touring, camping, backpacking, canoe tripping, rock climbing, general use, etc

Full disclosure: I was given this jacket from Outdoor Research for the purpose of this review as part of the #ORInsightLab. The opinions expressed here are completely my own.